Suggestions:
From the PRI on the GroupBProject:
Ok, what was listed as “research”, in your group project blog, was saying what you did and your data but not what you found. Like research could be either a percentage “75% of users preferred the updates” or a statement like “A majority of users were unable to perform task A”.
Now you might be thinking that “what you found” is an insight, so let me explain how they are different: A research item could be something like “95% of participants polled, who were Dr. Pepper fans, preferred the color blue” and an insight would be “We should implement blue into our design of Dr. Pepper cans”. Now this may or may not be a good idea, but it is very well documented how I came to that conclusion.
Research is what you found and an insight is more of like a course of action, in regards to your design, you will take, based on your research.
Blog related:
Here are some additional things to keep in mind when doing a Pukinskis set:
* Also, when you do a Pukinskis set, you need to list the items you are specifically looking at, so that a person can immediately see your train of thought. It makes it easier for a person to either agree or disagree with your train of thought.
* When doing a Pukinskis Set, you need to have either multiple research items and/or insights to help you produce the final part: the concepts.
* Research is your research findings, not how you did your research.
